IMO Fails to Reach Agreement on Net-Zero Framework

Talks at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have ended without consensus on the proposed Net-Zero Framework, leaving the global shipping sector uncertain about how its decarbonization efforts will be regulated in the coming years.

Delegates attending the Marine Environment Protection Committee’s (MEPC) special session in London voted to postpone discussions for another 12 months after they were unable to agree—or even hold a vote—on the draft amendments to MARPOL Annex VI, which include the core components of the framework.

The decision means that any adoption of the IMO’s Net-Zero Framework will now likely be delayed until late 2026 or later, further complicating efforts to meet the organization’s greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets established in 2023.

A Setback in the Push Toward 2050 Goals

The framework, which was approved in principle during the MEPC 83 session in April 2025, was designed to create a global fuel standard and an emissions pricing system—two key policy pillars that would guide the shipping industry toward achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Although the main talks have been adjourned, the Intersessional Working Group on GHG Emissions Reduction from Ships will continue its technical work from October 20 to 24, focusing on developing implementation guidelines in preparation for future discussions.

Industry Reactions: Frustration and Concern

The outcome has drawn widespread disappointment from across the maritime sector, with many warning that the year-long delay could slow investment, create uncertainty, and weaken momentum in the industry’s transition to cleaner energy.

The Global Maritime Forum described the adjournment as a major blow to global climate progress.

“Today’s adjournment is disappointing but not the end of the journey,” said Jesse Fahnestock, the Forum’s director of decarbonisation.

“Delaying for a full year makes delivery of the sector’s decarbonisation targets even more challenging,” he continued, urging countries that previously supported the framework to “reconfirm their commitment to multilateralism and continue the urgent work of developing guidelines and adopting a regulatory framework that can deliver on the IMO’s unanimously agreed GHG strategy.”

Calls for Clarity from Industry Leaders

The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) also voiced concern over the lack of progress.

“We are disappointed that member states have not been able to agree a way forward,” said Thomas Kazakos, ICS secretary general, emphasizing that “industry needs clarity to make the investments needed to decarbonise in line with the IMO’s goals.”

Similarly, Anne Steffensen, CEO of Danish Shipping, expressed her frustration at the stalled negotiations.

“We came here to finally conclude a crucial climate agreement for international shipping,” she said. “We from the Danish side have worked tirelessly towards this for a long time, so it’s a big disappointment.”

Outlook: Another Year of Uncertainty

With the discussions deferred for another year, the shipping industry faces ongoing uncertainty over future emissions rules, carbon pricing mechanisms, and fuel transition timelines.

While technical work continues behind the scenes, many observers warn that the delay risks pushing the sector further off course from achieving its 2050 net-zero goals, underscoring the urgent need for renewed cooperation among IMO member states when negotiations resume in 2026.